GoSouth

South African, Credible and Current

  • HOME
  • NEWS, FEATURES
    • Featured News
    • State Capture
  • FINANCE
  • SCI-TECH
  • INTERESTING
  • NATURE
  • LIFESTYLE
  • THE ARTS
  • SPORT
  • HISTORY
    • Cape South Peninsula

Theresa May Brexit deal hammered in parliament, but be wary of prospects of a new ‘consensus’ approach

To SHARE
Share on Facebook Share
Share on TwitterTweet
Share on Google Plus Share
Share on LinkedIn Share
Send email Mail

In essence, what May offered parliament was a “put-up or shut-up” proposition.
Should the government win the confidence motion – which looks very likely indeed – she will hold a series of cross-party talks, inviting parliament to bring ideas and suggestions about how to build a majority position. The results will then
be put to the EU for negotiation and agreement.

Simon Usherwood, Reader in Politics, University of Surrey

Another day, another record. The 230 majority against the motion to approve Theresa May’s withdrawal agreement on the UK’s exit from the EU smashes pretty much any parliamentary record one cares to discover.

That May’s immediate response was to make time for the house to debate and vote on Labour’s motion of no-confidence in her the day after her loss was thus hardly a surprise: how else to respond to such a heavy blow against the central platform and policy of the government?

And yet the abiding impression of these events was of avoiding a resolution, for as long as possible. Most obviously, May did not offer her resignation. That was a reflection not of her principles but rather her analysis of the situation. As she noted in her statement, a lack of majority for her deal doesn’t mean there’s a majority for another course of action. Without that alternative majority, she clearly feels there is still everything to play for and she is the right person for the job.

In essence, what May offered parliament was a “put-up or shut-up” proposition. Should the government win the confidence motion – which looks very likely indeed – she will hold a series of cross-party talks, inviting parliament to bring ideas and suggestions about how to build a majority position. The results will then be put to the EU for negotiation and agreement.

At one level, that might sound like a generous offering to a parliament that Number 10 has tried hard to keep well away from the process to date. It looks like a concession to those who have said May’s offer is unacceptable. But in practice, this is just another stage in the longer-term Number 10 strategy of whittling away the options available, until only the withdrawal agreement remains.

If you consider that there is no majority in parliament for any option at present – May’s deal, a softer form of Brexit, second referendum, or a revocation of the entire process – then this offer of talks looks more like a trap than an opportunity or a conciliatory gesture.

The only two changes that might win over the kinds of numbers of MPs to secure a majority both look problematic. For Tory backbenchers or the DUP, the big bone of contention is the backstop arrangement on Northern Ireland. A limit on its application or the power for the UK to decide alone not to use it would have a very big impact on the support the government could get. Yet this is clearly not going to gain the support of the EU, which sunk very deep red lines around that part of the agreement. It cannot move those lines without compromising the interests of one of its own member states.

Much more acceptable to the EU would be the other possible change: a commitment to a much softer Brexit, staying in the single market and the customs union, which would bring a lot of opposition parties on-side. In this case, the problem would be domestic: does May want to be propped up by the opposition; does the opposition want to prop up the government; and can May give up the one thing that has been central to her Brexit plans – an end to free movement?

In short, the offer to parliament is intended to demonstrate that despite all its faults and Tuesday night’s hammering, the withdrawal agreement is still on the table, agreed by the EU and there to potentially be put to another vote following further discussions and guarantees.

Thus we might find ourselves repeating this vote, with no substantive changes to the text and ever greater uncertainty about what will happen on March 29.

May’s withdrawal agreement might still have a future, but this vote means that it is unlikely ever to become a popular and positive choice for parliament, or for the public in general. Being the least-bad option could get it over one hurdle, but it points to the bigger questions that the UK still has to face – what does its future relationship with the EU actually look like?The Conversation

This article is republished from The Conversation under a Creative Commons license. Read the original article.

  • Share
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • WhatsApp
  • Email
  • Skype
  • LinkedIn

Related Posts

  • Theresa May defeats Brexit plotters – here’s what happens now

    Tom Quinn, Senior Lecturer, Department of Government, University of Essex After a week of humiliating…

  • Theresa May in Africa: cynical post-Brexit development agenda smacks of desperation

    Michael Jennings, Head of department, SOAS, University of London 30 August 2018 British ministers in…

  • May dvd Releases

    Courtesy Videorite Fish Hoek and Longbeach Videos Noordhoek PASSENGERS Adventure, Drama, Romance On a routine journey through space…

  • May dvd Releases

      MAZE RUNNER: THE DEATH CURSE Action, Sci-Fi, Thriller In the epic finale to the…

  • May dvd Releases

      BREATHE Biography, Drama, Romance The inspiring true love story between Robin and Diana Cavendish,…

To SHARE
Share on Facebook Share
Share on TwitterTweet
Share on Google Plus Share
Share on LinkedIn Share
Send email Mail

Contact US

  • Email
  • Facebook
  • Twitter

Search this Website

The Latest from GoSouth

  • Cats and the ‘Slow Blink’
    by Barbara …
  • 400,000 African pangolins are hunted for meat every year – why it’s time to act
    Daniel J Ingram, …
  • The Catholic Church is headed for another sex abuse scandal as #NunsToo speak up
    Kathleen McPhillips, …
  • PROPERTY RIGHTS: Are we approaching the end game?
    Dave Steward, Chairman …
  • Sibanye Stillwater: Almost 7 000 jobs on the line (contractors included)
    Tanisha Heiberg, REUTERS …
  • President Ramaphosa replies to SONA debate, and Lekota
    In his budget speech …
  • DPE – This is the state of Eskom
    13 February 2019 …
  • Lake Malawi is home to unique fish species. Nearly 10% are endangered
    Olaf Weyl, Chief …
  • What a major offshore gas find means for South Africa’s energy future
      Many South African …
  • The NHI Bill will soon be ready for submission to Parliament
    The NHI will enable …
  • Irrational AARTO Amendment Bill on its way to the President’s Desk
    In addition to public …
  • Ramaphosa’s plans aren’t enough to adequately tackle violent crime in S.Africa
    Guy Lamb, Director, …
  • No more talking Mr President. No more watching. South Africa needs action.
    We are a State of big …
  • Research shows BEES can add and subtract
    Despite having a brain …
  • Ramaphosa must act to save sugar industry from imminent collapse
    This R14 billion …

Copyright © 2019 — GoSouth • All rights reserved • Privacy Policy • Disclaimer • Terms & Conditions • Cookie Policy

loading Cancel
Post was not sent - check your email addresses!
Email check failed, please try again
Sorry, your blog cannot share posts by email.