We have been bombarded with COVID 19 “facts” from every means devised by man to transport information.
To try and make sense of what is to be believed, and what is hype, we contacted Dr. David Klatzow to give us his take on what’s really going on here, and come up with something we can believe. Find where the truth lies.
We have used the video below as a reference point and asked Dr. Klatzow for his perspective on what Dr Judy Mikovitz has to say. The video has been uploaded and deleted many times from YouTube. Who is hiding what, is she to be believed?
Let Dr. Klatzow take you through the facts and help you make up your own mind.
We live in a strange new world where post-truth seems to be as valid as truth. World leaders make irrational decisions about major policy issues that seem to change at the drop of a hat. We live in a world of social media and instant communication that demand instant responses. Our lives revolve around the “likes” and “views” one receives on an imaginary platform that only exists in cyberspace.
Society yearns for certainty
Our legal system has been contaminated with misleading American programs such as CSI and our universities worldwide have become hotbeds of post-modern ideology (at least the humanities and medicine departments).
The failure of the new certainties to produce reliable results in the legal context is born out by the growing number of exonerations coming to the fore in the last 10 years. This indicates a serious deficiency in what was formally accepted as bedrock forensic science wisdom. It is becoming increasingly apparent that the ‘publish or perish’ mentality at universities has produced scientific and especially medical research literature which is worse than useless.
John P A Ionnidis writing in the Public library of Science/Medicine (2 no 8, ), states ‘that most published findings in Medicine are false’. The reasons are not hard to find. Small experimental numbers, poor experimental design, and flagrant vested interests are but part of the problem. There is growing concern that ‘in modern research, false findings may be the majority or even the vast majority of published research claims. (Ionnidis)
Richard Horton, editor of the Lancet (you don’t get a more prestigious journal in medicine) states ‘much of the scientific literature, perhaps half, may simply be untrue’.
Angell M in an article Drug Companies and Doctors
A story of corruption has this to say: “It is simply no longer possible to believe much of the clinical work that is published or to rely on the judgement of trusted physicians or authoritative medical guidelines. I take no pleasure in this conclusion which I reached slowly and reluctantly over my 2 decades as editor of the New England Journal of Medicine.” See also ‘ Skeptical of Medical Science reports by Carlton Giles Can Vet J. 2015 Oct; 56(10) : pp1011-1012. Dealing with the same subject of unreliable research.
Universities which are the major source of research subscribe enthusiastically to the notion of ‘publish or perish’ As an academic one is unlikely to get tenure without a list of publications. As a direct result of this, the medical literature is full of junk science. William Broad and Nicholas Wade have written extensively about fraud and deceit in the halls of science in their book “Betrayers of the Truth” published by Century Publishing (London )1983.
Big Pharmacological companies
Sponsor much of the medical research at the world medical schools. If ever there was a conflict of interest here we have it writ large. The current vicious debate surrounding Cholesterol and heart disease is but a symptom of how far the food companies and the statin manufacturers have captured the medical profession. The research grant contract given by big pharmaceutical companies, vests the ownership of the data with the pharmaceutical house as well as the rights to publication. Not a healthy state of affairs.
One can all too easily fall foul of these large predatory companies as was discovered by S. Adams ( A former senior employee of Roche) who saw fit to take on the global giant Roche. They, in turn, moved heaven and earth to destroy Adams. (See the book Roche v Adams)
Use of animal-based vaccines
We as humans have been using the animal-based vaccine for as long as vaccines have been around.
Edward Jenner used exudate from coups lesions to inoculate humans. In so doing he ran grave risks and incurred the ire of his medical colleagues and others. Luckily this was the first step in the successful war against smallpox.
Louis Pasteur used the dried spinal cord of animals to produce the first anti-rabies treatment. Again this was done against the better knowledge of the establishment. He injected this crude material into a young boy who had been bitten by a rabid wolf. The boy survived and low and behold, Pasteur became an overnight celebrity.
Living as we do in the 21st century we seem to have forgotten the scourge of Poliomyelitis (Polio). America was galvanised into the March of Dimes in an effort to conquer the disease. Several teams were involved in developing a successful vaccine, including James Gear from South Africa. What is less well known is that these vaccines were developed using Poliovirus, grown in tissue culture of monkey kidney cells. These cultures contained significant quantities of monkey viruses which got injected along with the vaccine. It is also of great interest that the various researchers performed all their initial trials outside their own countries. Central Africa and Mauritius. Just in case of a medical disaster.
Man’s flirtation with animal-based vaccines
This flirtation is a long and successful one, however, in pursuing this course, the possibility of interspecies transfer of viruses must be kept firmly in mind. Recent examples have been Avian flu, Ebola, Monkeypox and the Hantaviruses.
Turning now to Judy Mikovits a recent whistle-blower in the Corona crisis
It is difficult to separate the true science from the false. She makes so many accusations where the basic science behind them seems to be lacking. It is difficult to accept her mass-conspiracy theory at face value. When you propound a theory without verification, you have founded a new type of religion. When you take the steps needed to verify it, you have the beginnings of science.
While I am reluctant to dismiss her statements out of hand, I would urge caution in accepting her accusations without considerable additional proof. She has an unusual history of her articles being retracted which should raise a few red flags.
It is high time that we start to apply some common sense.
The medical and veterinary misuse of antibiotics has brought us to a point where the microbial disease is increasingly difficult to treat. It is alas time that we realise that genetic engineering of infectious organisms may have brought mankind to the brink of a new Faustian pact.
(Faustian bargain, a pact whereby a person trades something of supreme moral or spiritual importance, such as personal values or the soul, for some worldly or material benefit, such as knowledge, power, or especially riches.)
We know too little about this virus to make irreversible policy decisions. “Expert views differ ranging from complete isolation and lock-down to allow the disease to spread and allow herd immunity to develop” I cannot say with certainty which is the preferred action, however, I can say that the world landscape that we have taken for granted up until now will never be the same in the foreseeable future. Air travel will change significantly. Motor car sales may not recover even to the depressed state before the virus struck.
At the onset of the pandemic, large companies were being urged to convert to producing ventilators. It would appear that this is the wrong course of treatment.
Those intrepid professionals who questioned the mainstream on this score were punished.
It may well be that the global backlash against China for possibly negligently (some say deliberately) releasing this virus, will gain momentum. Certainly, the criminality in delaying the warning to the world of the coming disaster is something the Chinese Communist Party needs to explain and threatening New Zealand for wanting an investigation compounds their criminality.
For now, common sense must prevail. I think that the damage caused by the lockdown will probably exceed the damage done by the virus.
Mankind needs to re-think the genomic tinkering with pathogenic (disease-causing) organisms. The results may well be more devastating than the nuclear accidents we have seen to date and they are bad enough.
The nature of this disease caused by Corona needs to be calmly and empirically investigated and the panic needs to subside. It is not widely published by the press that most people survive the infection.
The mass starvation and death rate from lockdown may not be so kind.
To confirm Dr David Klatzow’s suspicions, please see this link Fact-checking Judy Mikovits, the controversial virologist
* Dr. David Klatzow is an internationally recognised forensic scientist who conducts investigations in the fields of fraud, fire, ballistics and blood alcohol analysis. His career and experience in forensic science spans more than 30 years, with involvement in many and diverse cases and complicated issues related to forensic medicine in South Africa. He published the sought after book Steeped in Blood (2010) as well as Justice Denied (2014) as well as numerous other scientific publications. Dr. Klatzow can be contacted on firstname.lastname@example.org